Audit

Error Audit

AI-assisted quality check of development consent conditions

Canterbury-Bankstown Pilot

7 DAs audited from NSW Planning Portal and CBLPP agendas (Sep-Nov 2025)

39

Errors Found

7

DAs Audited

5.6

Avg Errors/DA

6

Systemic Defects

Key Finding

Canterbury-Bankstown's standard condition template contains at least 6 systemic errors that are copied into every consent that uses that template. The highest priority fix is the missing recipient in the waste records condition ("provided to ,") — this condition is legally unenforceable as written and appeared in 5 of 7 DAs.

Systemic Template Defects

Click an error to see the actual condition text where it appears

Isolated Errors

One-off mistakes in individual DAs

Error Correct Severity
Noise Control Regulation 2000 POEO (Noise Control) Regulation 2017 MODERATE
"XXXX" placeholder text Signatory name required HIGH
"(##)" placeholder Parking number required MODERATE
"Darted" instead of "Dated" Dated LOW
"Norht" instead of "North" North LOW
"Investifation" Investigation LOW
"GepEnviro" GeoEnviro LOW
"Plan of Managed" Plan of Management LOW
"Condition reason: Condition reason:" Remove duplicate LOW
AS 4970-2009 AS 4970:2025 LOW
"Bankstown Development Engineering Standards" Current CB reference MODERATE
Consent authority named 3 different ways Consistent naming LOW
Duplicate letter "(a)" in numbering Unique numbering LOW
Missing condition number Sequential numbering LOW

How It Works

Every condition of consent is read by AI (Claude) and checked against a reference list of:

  • Current names and years of NSW legislation (EP&A Act 1979, EP&A Regulation 2021, POEO Act 1997, etc.)
  • Current names of government agencies (SafeWork NSW, Transport for NSW, etc.)
  • Current editions of Australian Standards
  • Current planning instruments (Canterbury Bankstown LEP 2023, DCP 2023)
  • Correct spelling and grammar

Errors are classified as systemic (same error in multiple DAs = template problem) or isolated (one-off mistake in a single DA).

Severity is rated as HIGH (legal enforceability impact), MODERATE (incorrect reference but intent is clear), or LOW (typo or formatting issue).

What This Means for Council

Fixing 6 template defects would prevent these errors from appearing in every future consent. The "WorkCover NSW" reference (an agency abolished in 2015) appeared in 6 of 7 DAs — that's not individual mistakes, it's the template. One template fix = hundreds of future consents corrected.