North Sydney Heritage Conservation Conditions

1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Scope and Purpose of Report this Visual Impact report has been prepared for mHNDUnion Architects and is submitted to the North Sydney Council in support of a Development Application (DA) for a residential Flat building at No.2 Waruda Street, Kirribilli 2061 (the site). the report provides an analysis of the proposed development’s visual impact in relation to its visual and statutory contexts and is to be read in conjunction with the drawings and other material submitted with the development application. Figure 1 – Site location shown in magenta 1.2. The Proposed Development 1.2.1. The Site and existing property the subject site is legally described as Lot b in Dp 346417…

2. To insert the following new conditions A3, C36 and C37 as follows: Terms of Consent (D132/23/2) A3. Consent is granted for the following works: Level 1 (Units E2 and W2): • Re-configuration of the internal layout to provide a new stair to the new Level 2 accommodation, including the removal of the approved powder room and an associated window; • Laundry windows (W.E-1/L1, W.W-1/L1) increased in width and installation of additional full height joinery to laundry; and • Lift reveals amended to suit new Level 2 landing location. Level 2 (Units E2 and W2): • Construction of a new Level 2 master suite contained within a revised roof form. Incorporating stair from units lower level, lift…

3. The proposal results in minimal impact. Voting was as follows: Panel Member Yes No Community Representative Yes No Alison McCabe Y Meredith Trevallyn-Jones Y Jeremy Swan Y Lisa Trueman Y NORTH SYDNEY LOCAL PLANNING PANEL – 01/10/2025 Page No 4 ITEM 3 DA No: 150/25 ADDRESS: 47 East Crescent Street, Lavender Bay PROPOSAL: Alterations and additions to a heritage item REPORT BY NAME: Thomas Holman, Senior Assessment Officer APPLICANT: Amanda Smith One Written Submission Registered to speak Submitter Applicant/Representative Sarah Hofman - Resident Michael Bell - Michael Bell Architects Peter Krauss - Resident Michelle Bull - Michael Bell Architects Jack Thomas & Anne Nesbitt - Residents…

3. The amended development is not in the public interest given the above likely impacts. Particulars: a) The application is considered unacceptable pursuant to the provisions of s.4.15(1)(d) & (e) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in that the proposal is not considered to be in the public interest or suitable for the site. LPP06: 11 - 13 Bennett Street, Cremorne - DA 132/23/2 Applicant: CMBR Marine Pty Ltd Report of Robin Tse, Senior Assessment Officer This application under Section 4.56 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 seeks to modify an approved development granted by the NSW Land and Environment Court for the construction 2 x dual occupancy…

2. Submission received from an Adjoining Property Owner The submission (attached) outlines the following key grounds for objection: (a) Reintroduction of three storeys of living spaces – contrary to the original refusal and precedents of planning controls; (b) Misleading presentation of ground level “raising” as mitigation of height overage; (c) The majority of the roof and additional living level for Lot 1 is above 8.5m; (d) Failure to respect the character and amenity of the surrounding Conservation Area; and disregard for previous community concerns; (e) Undermining the principles of “once refused – consistency must follow”; and (f) Overall impacts on neighbours. Comment: The subject…

(Reason: To ensure that residents are kept informed of activities that may affect their amenity) Archaeological Discovery During Works E24. Should any historical or Aboriginal relic be discovered on the site during demolition, excavation or site preparatory works, all excavation or disturbance to the area is to stop immediately and the Heritage Council of NSW must be informed in accordance with the provisions of the Heritage Act 1977 and/or National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974. Works must not recommence until such time as approval to recommence is given in writing by Council or a permit from the Director of the NPWS is issued. (Reason: To prevent the unnecessary destruction or removal of…

2. The proposed development does not result in any unreasonable impact on the Union Bank and Thomas Heritage Conservation Area.