Canada Bay Traffic & Access Conditions
13 traffic & access conditions imposed by Canada Bay across 4 development applications in our dataset. Traffic and access conditions address vehicle and pedestrian movement — driveway and vehicle crossing design, sight lines, road and footpath works, traffic management plans and access for service and emergency vehicles.
5. The roof colour must be changed to a grey. A revised colour is required. Planning Comment Amended plans were submitted for assessment on 09 January 2026, which have been reviewed by Council’s Heritage Coordinator and subject to recommended conditions, the amended proposal addresses the heritage issues raised. ASSESSMENT OF THE HEIGHT OF BUILDINGS BREACH AGAINST CLAUSE 4.6 What is the development standard to be varied? Clause 4.3(2) of the Canada Bay Local Environmental Plan 2013 (CBLEP 2013) states that the height of a building is not to exceed the maximum height shown for the land on the Height of buildings map. The map shows that the maximum height permitted for a building on the…
1. Clause 4.6(3) Provisions: Sub-clause (3) of Clause 4.6 of the CBLEP 2013 states that development consent must not be granted for development that contravenes a development standard unless the consent authority has considered a written request from the applicant that seeks to justify the contravention of the development standard by demonstrating the following: a) compliance with the development standard is unreasonable or unnecessary in the circumstances of the case, and b) there are sufficient environmental planning grounds to justify contravening the development standard. In consideration of the applicant’s written submission, Council is not satisfied that it is unreasonable and…
7. CONCLUSION The proposed development is appropriately located within an R2 Low Density Residential zone under the provisions of Canada Bay Local Environmental Plan 2013 and is consistent with the statutory and non-statutory development standards and controls of relevance to the proposal. Further, the development performs adequately in terms of its relationship to the surrounding built and natural environment, particularly in relation to likely impacts upon surrounding properties. Consequently, the proposal is supported from an environmental planning perspective. RECOMMENDATION Pursuant to Sections 4.16 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (as amended): A. THAT following…
• Items listed under the consent of Civil Works in Public Domain application. The above works must be completed to the written satisfaction of Council prior to occupation of the building. Note: The above works will require the submission of the relevant application for the works to be undertaken. To preserve Council’s assets and amenity TfNSW Prior to student occupation of the site, the approved School Travel Plan shall be updated to incorporate the below comments and submitted to TfNSW for review and endorsement. Mode shares: TfNSW requires that single vehicle mode shares for staff be lowered to reduce car use, and that public transport and active transport are increased within the STP for…
7. Building Compliance - BCA The following building compliance matters have been identified in the assessment of this application and are required to be resolved prior to development consent, as it is likely to affect the design and function of the building and required for further assessment: i. The proposed media rooms have not been provided with natural lighting. This is not supported. The media and study rooms and media/study rooms are deemed habitable rooms under the NCC and must be provided with natural lighting to comply with F6D2 (Provision of natural light). A redesign of these spaces is required to achieve compliance if these rooms are to be maintained in the design. ii. The BCA…
8. CONCLUSION The proposed development is appropriately located within a R3 Medium Density Residential zone under the provisions of Canada Bay Local Environmental Plan 2013 however is not consistent with the statutory and non-statutory development standards and controls of relevance to the proposal. Further, the development does not perform adequately in terms of its relationship to the surrounding built and natural environment, particularly in relation to likely impacts upon surrounding properties. Consequently, the proposal is not supported from an environmental planning perspective. RECOMMENDATION Pursuant to Sections 4.16 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (as…
7. Proposed Traffic Generation and Public Transport Capacity In Section 5.2 ‘Proposed Traffic Generation’, of the Applicant's ‘Transport and Parking Impact Assessment’, it applies trip generation rates for high-density residential development with high public transport accessibility from the Guide to Traffic Impact Assessment (GTIA). However, GTIA Table 5.11 (High Density Residential Sample Summary) notes that Sydney average rates are not recommended unless the proposed development is located within 800 metres of a major transport interchange or multiple public transport services with sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed development’s person trips. Accordingly, the report is…
6. Proposed Traffic Generation and Public Transport Capacity Section 5.2 Proposed Traffic Generation applies trip generation rates for high- density residential development with high public transport accessibility from the Guide to Traffic Impact Assessment (GTIA). However, GTIA Table 5.11 (High Density Residential Sample Summary) notes that Sydney average rates are not recommended unless the proposed development is located within 800 metres of a major transport interchange or multiple public transport services with sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed development’s person trips. Accordingly, the report is required to: i. Demonstrate that the existing public transport services…
3. Waste Servicing and Vehicle Access Council does not support the proposed on-street waste collection arrangement (refer also to point 4 Waste Management Plan below). As per DCP B4.1 C11, to ensure safe and efficient waste servicing, the design must demonstrate that a 12.5m Heavy Rigid Vehicle (HRV) can access the basement waste collection/loading area. The following must be addressed: i. A swept path assessment showing an HRV entering and exiting the waste collection bay via the ramp in a forward direction. ii. A maximum three-point turn must be achievable for both entering and exiting manoeuvres. iii. The vehicle clearance envelope must remain free of columns, walls, storage areas, or…
5. Existing Traffic Conditions Section 2.4 Existing Traffic Conditions of the Transport and Parking Impact Assessment states that “based on on-site observations, traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site show minimal traffic volumes along St Georges Crescent and Queen Victoria Street during both peak and off-peak periods.” This statement is not supported by quantitative data and is vague in nature. The Applicant is to conduct traffic counts at the St Georges Crescent / Queen Victoria Document Set ID: 8839261 7 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/02/2026 Local Planning Panel Minutes Street intersection to substantiate this claim and to provide a clearer understanding of the existing traffic…
6. Existing Traffic Conditions In Section 2.4 ‘Existing Traffic Conditions’ of the Applicant's ‘Transport and Parking Impact Assessment’, it states that “based on on- site observations, traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site show minimal traffic volumes along St Georges Crescent and Queen Victoria Street during both peak and off-peak periods.” This statement is not supported by quantitative data and is vague in nature. The applicant has not conducted traffic counts at the St Georges Crescent / Queen Victoria Street intersection to substantiate this claim and also needs to provide a clearer understanding of the existing traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site.
3. Proposed Traffic Generation and Public Transport Capacity The report is required to: i. Demonstrate that the existing public transport services (bus and ferry) have sufficient spare capacity to accommodate the additional person trips generated by the development during peak periods in order to justify the usage of the utilised rates; or ii. If sufficient capacity cannot be justified, apply alternative and more appropriate GTIA trip generation rates consistent with the site’s actual public transport accessibility and service capacity. 93 Document Set ID: 8814790 Version: 5, Version Date: 13/02/2026
5. Temporary exclusion fencing must be installed along the rear boundary adjoining the public foreshore reserve prior to any works. No construction activities, material storage, or vehicle access are permitted beyond the site boundary. Existing foreshore vegetation must be protected and retained.
Snippets shown for reference only. Verify against the original consent on the NSW Planning Portal.
Traffic & Access conditions in other councils
Willoughby
112 conditions
Cumberland
84 conditions
Burwood
66 conditions
Newcastle
54 conditions
Ku-ring-gai
54 conditions
Wollongong
52 conditions
City of Ryde
46 conditions
Bayside
44 conditions
City of Parramatta
42 conditions
Hornsby
42 conditions
Inner West
37 conditions
Lane Cove
37 conditions
Randwick
36 conditions
Georges River
33 conditions
Fairfield
28 conditions
City of Sydney
26 conditions
Campbelltown
25 conditions
Sutherland
23 conditions
Camden
21 conditions
Strathfield
18 conditions
Canterbury-Bankstown
17 conditions
Waverley
17 conditions
North Sydney
15 conditions
Wollondilly
13 conditions
Blue Mountains
8 conditions
Hawkesbury
8 conditions
Northern Beaches
7 conditions
Lake Macquarie
5 conditions
Mosman
4 conditions
Woollahra
4 conditions